The 3-Dimensional Approach to AI Risk

AI adoption has exploded across enterprises, more than 77% of organizations are piloting or using generative AI in some capacity. 

But as AI systems scale, so do the risks. Models hallucinate. Embedded AI features appear in SaaS tools overnight. Users adopt shadow AI without approval. Regulations tighten globally.

To help organizations simplify this growing complexity, This concept developed a clear, structured, 3-dimensional approach to AI risk. It allows enterprises to evaluate risk across AI’s performance, societal impact, and model-level vulnerabilities, without requiring deep technical expertise.

This blog demystifies the model, explains its components, and shows why it matters for modern organizations practicing responsible AI and AI governance.

‍

TL;DR 

• AI introduces new risks across people, processes, and technology.
• 3-dimensional AI risk model helps classify and manage these risks.
• The three dimensions are: Operational, Societal, and Emerging/Model risks.
• Each dimension reveals where oversight and governance are needed.
• Understanding the framework helps teams build safer, more transparent, and compliant AI systems.

‍

Aiming to improve Identity & Access Management?

Our eBook outlines eight key areas and solutions to enhance access security and maintain compliance.

Download Resource

1. What Is the 3-Dimensional Approach to AI Risk?

3-dimensional approach to AI risk is a conceptual model that breaks down AI-related risks into three easy-to-understand categories. Instead of looking at AI risk as a single monolithic challenge, this framework encourages organizations to evaluate AI from three angles:

• How AI performs
• How AI impacts people
• How AI behaves and evolves

This is especially important because AI systems, unlike traditional software - learn, adapt, and generate outputs that cannot be consistently predicted. The model is:

• Business-friendly: Easy for CIOs, CISOs, procurement teams, and business leaders
• Technical enough: Useful for data and AI teams
• Scalable: Can be applied across internal AI models, SaaS integrations, and third-party vendors

By using this approach, teams can categorize risks more objectively and build structured governance frameworks.

A. Why AI Risk Needs a New Framework

Traditional IT risk frameworks fail because AI isn’t deterministic. Instead, AI behaves probabilistically. This leads to several unique challenges:

1. LLM unpredictability

Large language models don’t produce the same answer every time. They can hallucinate, fabricate facts, or generate unsafe content. Even the most advanced models (GPT-4, Claude, Gemini) have failure modes.

2. Data privacy and exposure

AI systems often rely on large datasets, including sensitive enterprise data. If models store or memorize this information, they become privacy liabilities.

3. Compliance pressure

Frameworks like the:

• EU AI Act
• NIST AI Risk Management Framework
• ISO/IEC AI standards

all demand transparency, explainability, and human-in-the-loop practices.

4. AI embedded everywhere

Most SaaS applications now ship AI features by default - email clients, video tools, CRM platforms, collaboration software, which creates shadow AI and unmonitored risk.

Because of this, organizations need a framework tailored specifically for AI unpredictability, explainability needs, and societal impact, not just cybersecurity threats.

B. How it  Categorizes AI Risks

AI Risk model organizes AI risks into three dimensions, each addressing a different type of exposure:

3. Why This Framework Matters for Enterprises

Enterprises need a structured way to discuss and evaluate AI risk framework gives organizations the clarity required to align stakeholders.

A. Why Enterprises Value the Framework

1. Makes AI risk easy for leadership

Executives don’t need deep AI literacy. The three dimensions provide:

• A clear vocabulary
• Simple classification
• Faster decision-making

2. Enables structured governance

Teams can categorize risks across:

• Operational controls
• Ethical reviews
• Technical safeguards

This supports better policy creation and compliance reporting.

3. Improves AI project approvals

Before deploying AI, teams can classify each project:

• Low-risk (automation, summarization)
• Medium-risk (recommendations, scoring)
• High-risk (decisions affecting people)

4. Aligns cross-functional teams

The model becomes a shared language for:

• IT
• Security
• Legal
• Procurement
• HR
• Data science

B. How Teams Use the Framework

1. AI Risk Scoring

Organizations build internal scoring matrices based on the three dimensions. This enables objective comparisons between AI use cases.

2. AI Project Approval Workflows

Risk levels determine:

• Required documentation
• Need for human oversight
• Whether deployment is allowed or restricted

3. Vendor & SaaS Evaluation

Procurement teams use the model to assess vendors embedding AI. Example: Evaluating a CRM vendor’s generative AI assistant for operational or societal risks.

4. Monitoring & Compliance

The model helps teams:

• Track model drift
• Maintain audit trails
• Document bias mitigation
• Prepare for EU AI Act classification

It becomes the backbone of internal AI governance.

Seeking smoother offboarding processes?

Our checklist helps HR and IT complete asset collection and access revocation for secure transitions.

Download Resource

4. Conclusion

3-dimensional approach to AI risk gives enterprises a practical way to understand the complexity of AI. By categorizing risks into Operational, Societal, and Emerging/Model layers, teams can evaluate AI systems more holistically, implement guardrails, and strengthen governance.

As AI becomes embedded across every SaaS tool and workflow, having a structured framework is no longer optional, it’s essential. 

The 3-dimensional model helps organizations move toward safer, more accountable, and more responsible AI adoption.‍

Want to evaluate AI risk across your SaaS stack?

Book a personalized CloudEagle demo to discover shadow AI, assess vendor AI features, and build effective AI governance frameworks.

‍

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Does the model apply to generative AI?

Yes. GenAI fits all three dimensions, especially operational instability, societal bias, and emerging risks like prompt injection.

2. How can AI risk be quantified?

Organizations use scoring matrices based on impact, likelihood, regulatory exposure, and dependency to measure AI risk objectively.

3. Who owns AI risk internally?

Ownership is shared across IT, security, data, legal, and procurement teams. No single function can manage AI risk alone.

4. How often should AI risks be reviewed?

High-impact models need quarterly reviews; GenAI systems may require continuous monitoring due to frequent updates and drift.

5. Does using external AI providers reduce risk?

It reduces development burden but increases dependency, update unpredictability, and transparency limitations.

6. Why is human-in-the-loop important?

HITL adds oversight for sensitive decisions, reducing harm from low-confidence or biased AI outputs.